From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Arido-Sorro v. Garland

United States District Court, District of Arizona
Oct 3, 2024
No. CV-23-00842-PHX-JAT (D. Ariz. Oct. 3, 2024)

Opinion

CV-23-00842-PHX-JAT

10-03-2024

Marvin Arido-Sorro, Petitioner, v. Merrick B Garland, et al., Respondents.


ORDER

James A. Teilborg Senior United States District Judge.

On September 4, 2024, the Magistrate Judge issued an order instructing Respondents to “file a status report informing the Court of the status of Petitioner's removal proceedings within ten days from the date of this order, and every sixty days thereafter.” (Doc. 36). On September 5, 2024, the Magistrate Judge issued its Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) recommending that this Court require the Immigration Court to hold a bond hearing. (Doc. 37).

The Magistrate Judge's order only mandated Respondents to file a status report. Petitioner also filed a status report, which was not required. Thus, the Court writes this order to further clarify the filings.

It appears to the Court there are no objections to the R&R's recommendation. However, to ensure neither the government nor petitioner misunderstood their respective “status reports” to be substitutes for objections,

IT IS ORDERED that any objections to the R&R are due in 14 days. If no objections are received, the Court will adopt the R&R.


Summaries of

Arido-Sorro v. Garland

United States District Court, District of Arizona
Oct 3, 2024
No. CV-23-00842-PHX-JAT (D. Ariz. Oct. 3, 2024)
Case details for

Arido-Sorro v. Garland

Case Details

Full title:Marvin Arido-Sorro, Petitioner, v. Merrick B Garland, et al., Respondents.

Court:United States District Court, District of Arizona

Date published: Oct 3, 2024

Citations

No. CV-23-00842-PHX-JAT (D. Ariz. Oct. 3, 2024)