From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Arias v. Cullen

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 15, 2011
NO. CIV.S-99-0627 WBS DAD DP (E.D. Cal. Sep. 15, 2011)

Opinion

NO. CIV.S-99-0627 WBS DAD DP

09-15-2011

PEDRO ARIAS, Petitioner, v. VINCE CULLEN, Warden, San Quentin State Prison, Respondent.


CAPITAL CASE


ORDER

Petitioner has filed an unopposed request to modify the briefing schedule and extend by 4 days the time in which to prepare and file the traverse, from September 15, 2011, to September 19, 2011, which will also address the impact of Cullen v. Pinholster, 563 U.S. __, 131 S. Ct. 1388 (2011) on this matter.

Good cause appearing, it is hereby ordered that:

By September 19, 2011, petitioner shall file the reply or traverse or other appropriate pleading, which will also address the impact of Cullen v. Pinholster here. Within another thirty days, respondent will submit a responsive pleading addressing the impact of Pinholster here and petitioner may submit any reply within fourteen days thereafter. The status conference set for November 10, 2011, at 10:00 a.m. remains as scheduled.

DALE A. DROZD

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Arias v. Cullen

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 15, 2011
NO. CIV.S-99-0627 WBS DAD DP (E.D. Cal. Sep. 15, 2011)
Case details for

Arias v. Cullen

Case Details

Full title:PEDRO ARIAS, Petitioner, v. VINCE CULLEN, Warden, San Quentin State…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Sep 15, 2011

Citations

NO. CIV.S-99-0627 WBS DAD DP (E.D. Cal. Sep. 15, 2011)