From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Argueta v. United States

United States District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania
Nov 3, 2022
3:22-CV-812 (M.D. Pa. Nov. 3, 2022)

Opinion

3:22-CV-812

11-03-2022

VILAS ARGUETA, Plaintiff v. UNITED STATES, et al., Defendants


ORDER

Robert D. Mariani, United States District Judge

AND NOW, THIS 3rd DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2022, upon review of Magistrate Judge Mehalchick's Report & Recommendation (“R&R”) (Doc. 10) for clear error or manifest injustice, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

1. The R&R (Doc. 10) is ADOPTED for the reasons stated therein.

2. Plaintiff's action is DISMISSED pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b) for failure to comply with the Court's Orders and for failure to prosecute this action.

Judge Mehalchick's reasoning and conclusion that Plaintiff has failed to prosecute and has abandoned this action is further supported by Plaintiffs failure to file any Objections to the pending R&R. The Court also agrees with the R&R's findings that an application of the Poulis factors further supports the dismissal of this action. See (Doc. 10, at 4-8); Poulis v. State Farm Fire and Cas. Co., 747 F.2d 863 (3d Cir. 1984).

3. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this action.


Summaries of

Argueta v. United States

United States District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania
Nov 3, 2022
3:22-CV-812 (M.D. Pa. Nov. 3, 2022)
Case details for

Argueta v. United States

Case Details

Full title:VILAS ARGUETA, Plaintiff v. UNITED STATES, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania

Date published: Nov 3, 2022

Citations

3:22-CV-812 (M.D. Pa. Nov. 3, 2022)