From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Argueta v. Biter

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California
Sep 25, 2013
CV 11-9246-JGB (JEM) (C.D. Cal. Sep. 25, 2013)

Opinion


EMILIO ARGUETA, Petitioner, v. MARTIN BITER, Warden, Respondent. No. CV 11-9246-JGB (JEM). United States District Court, C.D. California. September 25, 2013.

          ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

          JESUS G. BERNAL, District Judge.

         Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636, the Court has reviewed the pleadings, the records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Petitioner has filed Objections, and the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which Petitioner has objected. The Court accepts the findings and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.

         IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: (1) the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is denied; and (2) Judgment shall be entered dismissing the action with prejudice.


Summaries of

Argueta v. Biter

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California
Sep 25, 2013
CV 11-9246-JGB (JEM) (C.D. Cal. Sep. 25, 2013)
Case details for

Argueta v. Biter

Case Details

Full title:EMILIO ARGUETA, Petitioner, v. MARTIN BITER, Warden, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California

Date published: Sep 25, 2013

Citations

CV 11-9246-JGB (JEM) (C.D. Cal. Sep. 25, 2013)