From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Argo v. State

Criminal Court of Appeals of Oklahoma
May 19, 1923
214 P. 1085 (Okla. Crim. App. 1923)

Opinion

No. A-4047.

Opinion Filed May 19, 1923.

(Syllabus.)

Appeal and Error — Dismissal — Acceptance of Pardon by Appellant. When the pardoning power extends clemency, and the same is accepted pending the determination of an appeal, the appeal will be dismissed.

Appeal from District Court, Caddo County; Will Linn, Judge.

George D. Argo was convicted of the crime of wife abandonment after seduction and marriage, and he appeals. Appeal dismissed.

Morgan Osmond, for plaintiff in error.

George F. Short, Atty. Gen., and Leon S. Hirsh, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.


Plaintiff in error, George D. Argo, was convicted in the district court of Caddo county at the February term, 1921, of the crime above stated and punishment fixed as above stated. From such judgment of conviction he appeals to this court.

The Attorney General has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal on the ground that a parole has been granted by the Governor and accepted by the plaintiff in error. A copy of the parole and the acceptance thereof by plaintiff in error is attached to the motion to dismiss this appeal. When a parole is granted and accepted, and notice of that fact is brought to the attention of this court pending the appeal, the appeal will be dismissed. Noret v. State, 15 Okla. Cr. 574, 179 P. 617; Ernst v. State, 17 Okla. Cr. 282, 187 P. 930; Brown v. State, 16 Okla. Cr. 505, 184 P. 912.

The appeal herein is therefore dismissed, and the cause remanded to the district court of Caddo county.

DOYLE and BESSEY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Argo v. State

Criminal Court of Appeals of Oklahoma
May 19, 1923
214 P. 1085 (Okla. Crim. App. 1923)
Case details for

Argo v. State

Case Details

Full title:GEORGE D. ARGO v. STATE

Court:Criminal Court of Appeals of Oklahoma

Date published: May 19, 1923

Citations

214 P. 1085 (Okla. Crim. App. 1923)
214 P. 1085