From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Argila v. Harley

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 31, 1991
169 A.D.2d 683 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)

Summary

refusing to limit damages in "legal malpractice action alleg[ing] that defendants negligently allowed the statute of limitations to run."

Summary of this case from Prout v. Vladeck

Opinion

January 31, 1991

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (David H. Edwards, Jr., J.).


The plaintiffs in this legal malpractice action allege that defendants negligently allowed the Statute of Limitations to run in their medical malpractice action against a physician and hospital in Greensboro, North Carolina. Defendants moved for partial summary judgment to limit plaintiffs' recovery to $30,000, on the basis of affidavits from two North Carolina attorneys who estimated that the case was worth no more than that amount before a North Carolina jury. We agree with the Supreme Court's determination that granting the defendants' motion would impermissibly usurp the jury's function. The defendants cite no case in which damages have been "capped" on a motion for partial summary judgment.

We likewise find no merit to defendants' alternative argument that damages should be limited to $100,000, the amount of an insurance policy attached in New York under Seider v Roth ( 17 N.Y.2d 111). That attachment had been vacated when the alleged malpractice herein occurred, and accordingly cannot establish an upper limit on the damages that could have been recovered by plaintiffs if a timely action had been commenced in North Carolina.

Concur — Sullivan, J.P., Carro, Rosenberger and Kupferman, JJ.


Summaries of

Argila v. Harley

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 31, 1991
169 A.D.2d 683 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)

refusing to limit damages in "legal malpractice action alleg[ing] that defendants negligently allowed the statute of limitations to run."

Summary of this case from Prout v. Vladeck
Case details for

Argila v. Harley

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPH ARGILA, JR., et al., Respondents, v. ROBERT HARLEY et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jan 31, 1991

Citations

169 A.D.2d 683 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)

Citing Cases

Prout v. Vladeck

Considering, then, only the facts pled in the complaint, these allegations, viewed in the light most…