From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Argel v. Cisneros

United States District Court, Central District of California
Jan 11, 2024
CV 22-07993 ODW (RAO) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 11, 2024)

Opinion

CV 22-07993 ODW (RAO)

01-11-2024

JOHN WILLIAM ARGEL, Petitioner, v. CISNEROS, Warden, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

OTIS D. WRIGHT II UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, all of the records and files herein, and the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 43). The Court has further engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report and Recommendation issued on December 14, 2023, to which Petitioner has objected (Dkt. No. 44). The Court is not persuaded by Petitioner's objections and hereby accepts and adopts the findings, conclusions, and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.

IT IS ORDERED that the Petition is dismissed with prejudice.


Summaries of

Argel v. Cisneros

United States District Court, Central District of California
Jan 11, 2024
CV 22-07993 ODW (RAO) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 11, 2024)
Case details for

Argel v. Cisneros

Case Details

Full title:JOHN WILLIAM ARGEL, Petitioner, v. CISNEROS, Warden, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Jan 11, 2024

Citations

CV 22-07993 ODW (RAO) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 11, 2024)