Arganda v. City of Westminster

Full title: WILLIAM ARGANDA, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF WESTMINSTER, et al., Defendants.

Court: United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California, Western Division

Date published: Nov 8, 2013

SA CV 11-01500-GW (VBK) (C.D. Cal. Nov. 8, 2013)

Opinion

WILLIAM ARGANDA, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF WESTMINSTER, et al., Defendants. No. SA CV 11-01500-GW (VBK) United States District Court, C.D. California, Western Division. November 8, 2013

          ORDER (1) ACCEPTING THE FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE, AND (2) DISMISSING THE COMPLAINT

          GEORGE H. WU, District Judge.

         Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Complaint and all other papers along with the attached Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, and has made a de novo determination of the Report and Recommendation.

         IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that a Judgment be entered (1) approving the findings of the United States Magistrate Judge, (2) granting Defendants City of Westminster and Ronald Coopman's Motion for Summary Judgment; and (3) directing that Judgment be entered dismissing the Complaint, and the action, with prejudice.