From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Arevalo v. UMH Props., Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE MEMPHIS DIVISION
Jul 2, 2013
Case No. 11-2339 (W.D. Tenn. Jul. 2, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. 11-2339

07-02-2013

NUVIA AREVALO, ET AL., Plaintiffs, v. UMH PROPERTIES, INC., ET AL., Defendants.


SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

ARTHUR J. TARNOW


MAGISTRATE JUDGE TU M. PHAM


ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND

RECOMMENDATION [70]; AND DENYING DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS

[21] WITHOUT PREJUDICE

Before the Court is Defendants' Motion to Dismiss [21], filed on September 19, 2011. One June 25, 2013, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation [70] recommending that the Court deny Defendants' Motion to Dismiss [21] without prejudice and allow non-arbitrating Plaintiffs to file an amended complaint.

The parties have not filed any objections the Report and Recommendation [70]. The Court has reviewed the record in this case.

The Report and Recommendation [70] of the Magistrate Judge is hereby ADOPTED and is entered as the findings and conclusions of the Court.

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED that Defendants' Motion to Dismiss [21] is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that non-arbitrating Plaintiffs file an amended complaint in accordance with the Report and Recommendation [70].

SO ORDERED.

___________

ARTHUR J. TARNOW

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Arevalo v. UMH Props., Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE MEMPHIS DIVISION
Jul 2, 2013
Case No. 11-2339 (W.D. Tenn. Jul. 2, 2013)
Case details for

Arevalo v. UMH Props., Inc.

Case Details

Full title:NUVIA AREVALO, ET AL., Plaintiffs, v. UMH PROPERTIES, INC., ET AL.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE MEMPHIS DIVISION

Date published: Jul 2, 2013

Citations

Case No. 11-2339 (W.D. Tenn. Jul. 2, 2013)