In Arend v. Liverpool, etc., Co., 6 Lans. 457; affirmed, 53 N.Y. 606, the court said: "The importer of the cask of wine, after learning that the defendants had suffered a loss of the wine, assigned his claim against the defendants to the plaintiff, who brought the action.
Summary of this case from Livingston v. SperoArgued May 6, 1873
Decided May 13, 1873
J.W. Gerard, Jr., for the appellant.
Louis H. Rowan for the respondent.
Agree to affirm. No opinion.
Judgment affirmed.
In Arend v. Liverpool, etc., Co., 6 Lans. 457; affirmed, 53 N.Y. 606, the court said: "The importer of the cask of wine, after learning that the defendants had suffered a loss of the wine, assigned his claim against the defendants to the plaintiff, who brought the action.
Summary of this case from Livingston v. SperoFull title:OTTO AREND, Respondent, v . THE LIVERPOOL, NEW YORK AND PHILADELPHIA…
Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Date published: May 13, 1873
" In Arend v. Liverpool, etc., Co., 6 Lans. 457; affirmed, 53 N.Y. 606, the court said: "The importer of the…