From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Arena v. Navarro

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Sep 11, 2023
1:20-cv-00617-BAM (PC) (E.D. Cal. Sep. 11, 2023)

Opinion

1:20-cv-00617-BAM (PC)

09-11-2023

PETER M. ARENA, Plaintiff, v. NAVARRO, et al., Defendants.


ORDER REQUIRING DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR GLOBAL SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE (ECF NO. 56) TWENTY-ONE (21) DAY DEADLINE

BARBARA A. MCAULIFFE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Plaintiff Peter Michael Arena (“Plaintiff”') is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action proceeds on Plaintiff's first amended complaint against Defendants Medina, Allison, Ramos, Pacheco, and Navarro for excessive force in violation of the Eighth Amendment. All parties have consented to United States Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (ECF No. 35.)

On September 7, 2023, Plaintiff filed a motion requesting a settlement conference in this action and in another pending action, Arena v. Cervantes, Case No. 1:21-cv-00928-JLT-BAM. (ECF No. 56.) Plaintiff states that he recently came to a verbal agreement with defense counsel in Arena v. Cervantes action during a phone conversation, agreeing to an approximate settlement amount for both pending actions, and was told that another phone conference or discussion would occur in June with attorneys from both actions to resolve these cases. As that did not occur, Plaintiff is now requesting that the Court set both cases for a settlement conference. (Id.)

The Court generally will not grant motions to set a settlement conference without confirmation that all parties feel that a settlement conference would be a beneficial use of resources of the parties and the Court. Therefore, the Court finds it appropriate to obtain a brief response from Defendants in both actions regarding Plaintiff's request for a settlement conference, indicating whether Defendants are also willing to participate in a judicially mediated settlement conference in either or both of these pending cases. The parties are further reminded that they are free to communicate regarding a possible settlement, without judicial involvement.

Accordingly, Defendants are HEREBY ORDERED to file a brief written response to Plaintiff's motion for a settlement conference, (ECF No. 56), within twenty-one (21) days from the date of service of this order.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Arena v. Navarro

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Sep 11, 2023
1:20-cv-00617-BAM (PC) (E.D. Cal. Sep. 11, 2023)
Case details for

Arena v. Navarro

Case Details

Full title:PETER M. ARENA, Plaintiff, v. NAVARRO, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Sep 11, 2023

Citations

1:20-cv-00617-BAM (PC) (E.D. Cal. Sep. 11, 2023)