From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Arechiga v. Target Corp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
Oct 18, 2011
Case No. 3:1 l-cv-00844-CRB (N.D. Cal. Oct. 18, 2011)

Opinion

Case No. 3:1 l-cv-00844-CRB

10-18-2011

MELISSA ARECHIGA, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. TARGET CORPORATION, and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, Defendant.

H. Tim Hoffman (SBN 049141) Arthur W. Lazear (SBN 083603) Chad A. Saunders (SBN 257810) HOFFMAN & LAZEAR Newman Strawbridge (SBN 171360) LAW OFFICE OF NEWMAN STRAWBRIDGE Attorneys for Plaintiff MELISSA ARECHIGA DAVID F. MCDOWELL (CA SBN 125806) MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP TIFFANY CHEUNG (CA SBN 211497) MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP Attorneys for Defendant TARGET CORPORATION


H. Tim Hoffman (SBN 049141)

Arthur W. Lazear (SBN 083603)

Chad A. Saunders (SBN 257810)

HOFFMAN & LAZEAR

Newman Strawbridge (SBN 171360)

LAW OFFICE OF NEWMAN

STRAWBRIDGE

Attorneys for Plaintiff

MELISSA ARECHIGA

DAVID F. MCDOWELL (CA SBN 125806)

MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP

TIFFANY CHEUNG (CA SBN 211497)

MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP

Attorneys for Defendant

TARGET CORPORATION

CLASS ACTION


STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITH

PREJUDICE OF CLASS ACTION

COMPLAINT AND FOR WAIVER OF

FEES AND COSTS BY PLAINTIFF AND


DEFENDANT

Trial Date: Not Set

TO THE HONORABLE COURT, ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD:

WHEREAS, plaintiff Melissa Arechiga ("Plaintiff) filed a complaint on February 23, 2011, alleging violations of California's Song-Beverly Credit Card Act (the "Action") against defendant Target Corp. ("Defendant," and with Plaintiff, the "Stipulating Parties"); and

WHEREAS, the Stipulating Parties have exchanged extensive informal discovery during the past several months, including Plaintiffs relevant credit card statements, Defendant's relevant policy and procedure documents, records of Plaintiff s relevant purchase transactions with Defendant, and declarations by one of Defendant's employees knowledgeable about the issues relevant to the Action; and

WHEREAS, Plaintiff believes that, if true, the information provided by Defendant thus far would likely defeat her claims asserted in the Complaint and that the costs of continuing to litigate this case are now higher than her likelihood of success; and

WHEREAS, no consideration, either direct or indirect, has been given in exchange for the dismissal with prejudice of the Action; and

WHEREAS, the Stipulating Parties have agreed to each bear their own attorneys' fees and costs related to the Action and its dismissal.

NOW, THEREFORE, the Stipulating Parties hereby stipulate and request that the Court approve this stipulated voluntary dismissal and dismiss the Action, and all causes of action alleged therein, with prejudice, as to all Defendants and order the Stipulating Parties to bear their own attorneys' fees and costs.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

HOFFMAN & LAZEAR

By ________________

Chad A. Saunders

Attorneys for Plaintiff Melissa Arechiga

MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP

By ____________

Tiffany Cheung

Attorneys for Defendant TARGET CORP.

[PROPOSED] ORDER

The Court, having reviewed the above stipulation of the Stipulating Parties, HEREBY ORDERS THAT:

1. The action filed by plaintiff Melissa Arechiga entitled Arechiga v. Target Corporation, Case No. 3:1 l-cv-00844-CRB (the "Action"), is hereby voluntarily dismissed, with prejudice, in its entirety, including all causes of action therein, as to all defendants; and

2. The Stipulating Parties are to bear their own attorneys' fees and costs in connection with the Action and its dismissal.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Hon. Charles R. Breyer

United States Distrct Judge


Summaries of

Arechiga v. Target Corp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
Oct 18, 2011
Case No. 3:1 l-cv-00844-CRB (N.D. Cal. Oct. 18, 2011)
Case details for

Arechiga v. Target Corp.

Case Details

Full title:MELISSA ARECHIGA, individually and on behalf of all others similarly…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

Date published: Oct 18, 2011

Citations

Case No. 3:1 l-cv-00844-CRB (N.D. Cal. Oct. 18, 2011)