From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ardolino v. MannKind Corp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 19, 2016
Case No. 2:16-CV-00348 RGK (GJSx) (C.D. Cal. Sep. 19, 2016)

Opinion

Case No. 2:16-CV-00348 RGK (GJSx)

09-19-2016

ERIC ARDOLINO, individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff, v. MANNKIND CORPORATION, ALFRED MANN, MATTHEW PFEFFER, and HAKAN EDSTROM, Defendants.


JUDGMENT

Whereas, on June 15, 2016, Plaintiffs, individually and on behalf of all other persons similarly situated, filed the Amended Class Action Complaint for Violation of the Federal Securities Laws. (Dkt. No. 49.)

Whereas, on June 29, 2016, Defendants MannKind Corporation, Hakan Edstrom, and Matthew Pfeffer ("Defendants") filed their Motion to Dismiss the Consolidated Amended Complaint. (Dkt. No. 50.)

Whereas, on July 15, 2016, Plaintiffs filed their Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss the Consolidated Amended Complaint. (Dkt. No. 53.)

Whereas, on August 8, 2016, Defendants filed their Reply in Support of Defendants' Motion to Dismiss the Consolidated Amended Complaint. (Dkt. No. 54.)

Whereas, on August 19, 2016, Plaintiffs filed a Notice of Supplemental Authority in Further Support of Lead Plaintiffs' Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss the Consolidated Amended Complaint. (Dkt. No. 56.)

Whereas, on August 22, 2016, Defendants filed their Objection and Response to Plaintiffs' Supplemental Authority in Further Support of Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss the Consolidated Amended Complaint. (Dkt. No. 58.)

Whereas, on August 23, 2016, the Court granted Defendants' Motion to Dismiss the Consolidated Amended Complaint with prejudice as to all claims and without leave to amend. (Dkt. No. 60.)

THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED THAT:

1. This action is dismissed with prejudice as to all Defendants;

2. The Court retains jurisdiction to enforce this judgment and its previous orders // //

3. The Court, finding that no reason exists for delay, hereby directs the Clerk to enter this final judgment, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58. Dated: September 19, 2016

/s/_________

Hon. R. Gary Klausner

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Ardolino v. MannKind Corp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 19, 2016
Case No. 2:16-CV-00348 RGK (GJSx) (C.D. Cal. Sep. 19, 2016)
Case details for

Ardolino v. MannKind Corp.

Case Details

Full title:ERIC ARDOLINO, individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Sep 19, 2016

Citations

Case No. 2:16-CV-00348 RGK (GJSx) (C.D. Cal. Sep. 19, 2016)