From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Arden v. Kastell

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
Nov 2, 2011
Case No. 10-cv-00436 NC (N.D. Cal. Nov. 2, 2011)

Opinion

Case No. 10-cv-00436 NC Re: Docket No. 75

11-02-2011

GARY ARDEN, Plaintiff, v. FRANK KASTELL, LINARD DAVIS, AIRPORT TRAVEL AGENCY, INC., ALLA SERDYUCHENKO, RON BRIGHAM, SMARTE CARTE, Inc., and Does 1-10, Defendants.


ORDER RE: NOTICE OF UNTIMELY FILING

Plaintiff Gary Arden has filed a Notice of Untimely Filing of the Declaration of Charles Carreon in Opposition to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. No. 75). The Court finds that the reasons for the filing delay - length of exhibits and an unknown technical error - are sufficient under Civil General Order 45 to consider timely documents filed the next business day, November 1, 2011. See Gen. Order 45(VI)(e). The Court also finds that the late filing, which was completed 12 minutes after the filing deadline, has caused no prejudice.

For good cause showing, the Court will take into consideration the Declaration of Charles Carreon and attached Exhibits in support of Plaintiff's Opposition to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

NATHANAEL M. COUSINS

United States Magistrate Judge


Summaries of

Arden v. Kastell

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
Nov 2, 2011
Case No. 10-cv-00436 NC (N.D. Cal. Nov. 2, 2011)
Case details for

Arden v. Kastell

Case Details

Full title:GARY ARDEN, Plaintiff, v. FRANK KASTELL, LINARD DAVIS, AIRPORT TRAVEL…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

Date published: Nov 2, 2011

Citations

Case No. 10-cv-00436 NC (N.D. Cal. Nov. 2, 2011)