From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ardds v. Martin

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jul 16, 2021
2:20-cv-0133 TLN KJN P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 16, 2021)

Opinion

2:20-cv-0133 TLN KJN P

07-16-2021

ANTOINE L. ARDDS, Plaintiff, v. K. MARTIN, et al., Defendants.


[PROPOSED] ORDER

KENDALL J. NEWMAN UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding pro se. On July 15, 2021, defendant V. Kieu filed a motion for extension of time to file a responsive pleading. Upon consideration, and good cause appearing defendant's motion is granted. Defendant V. Kieu shall file a responsive pleading on or before August 11, 2021. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Defendant's motion for an extension of time (ECF No. 30) is granted; and

2. Defendant V. Kieu shall file a responsive pleading on or before August 11, 2021.


Summaries of

Ardds v. Martin

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jul 16, 2021
2:20-cv-0133 TLN KJN P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 16, 2021)
Case details for

Ardds v. Martin

Case Details

Full title:ANTOINE L. ARDDS, Plaintiff, v. K. MARTIN, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Jul 16, 2021

Citations

2:20-cv-0133 TLN KJN P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 16, 2021)