From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Arcos v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas, Corpus Christi
Feb 25, 1982
628 S.W.2d 867 (Tex. App. 1982)

Opinion

No. 13-81-377-CR (2441 CR).

February 25, 1982.

Appeal from the 28th District Court, Nueces County, Walter Dunham, J.

Tony Bonilla, Bonilla, Read, Bonilla Berlanga, Inc., Corpus Christi, Walter Boyd, Houston, for appellant.

Wm. B. Mobley, Jr., Dist. Atty., Corpus Christi, for appellee.

Before NYE, C. J., and YOUNG and GONZALEZ, JJ.


OPINION


This is an appeal from a conviction for aggravated robbery. Appellant pled guilty to a jury. The jury denied his application for probation and assessed his punishment at five years.

We note that the record has come forward with an agreed statement of facts under Tex Code Crim.Proc.Ann., art. 40.09 § 11 (Vernon Supp. 1982). For this we commend the parties.

In his only ground of error, appellant contends that the trial court erred in refusing to include in the charge an instruction and a verdict form which would permit the jury to assess a penitentiary term with probation and a fine that was not probated. The punishment option requested by appellant is authorized under Tex Code Crim.Proc.Ann. art. 42.12 (Vernon 1979). Ex parte McIver, 586 S.W.2d 851 (Tex.Cr.App. 1979). Refusal to submit this option to the jury was error.

The judgment of the trial court is reversed and the cause is remanded.


Summaries of

Arcos v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas, Corpus Christi
Feb 25, 1982
628 S.W.2d 867 (Tex. App. 1982)
Case details for

Arcos v. State

Case Details

Full title:Oscar ARCOS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Corpus Christi

Date published: Feb 25, 1982

Citations

628 S.W.2d 867 (Tex. App. 1982)

Citing Cases

Mccloud v. State

The punishment option he requested is authorized by Tex Code Crim.P.Ann. art. 42.12, sec. 3a (Vernon supp.…

Martinez v. State

We hold that there is a final judgment of conviction to support the probated part of a split sentence, and…