Arcos v. Hudson Ins. Co.

Full title: KRISTINE ARCOS, an individual, Plaintiff, v. HUDSON INSURANCE COMPANY, ROE…

Court: United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Dec 5, 2022

3:22-cv-00493-LRH-CSD (D. Nev. Dec. 5, 2022)

Opinion

3:22-cv-00493-LRH-CSD

12-05-2022

KRISTINE ARCOS, an individual, Plaintiff, v. HUDSON INSURANCE COMPANY, ROE CORPORATIONS I-X and DOES I-X inclusive, Defendants.

GALLOWAY & JENSEN ROBERT R. JENSEN Attorney for Plaintiff GORDON REES SCULLY MANSUKHANI Thierry Barkley Attorney for Defendant

LARRY R. HICKS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

GALLOWAY & JENSEN ROBERT R. JENSEN Attorney for Plaintiff

GORDON REES SCULLY MANSUKHANI Thierry Barkley Attorney for Defendant

ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE REPLY ON MOTION TO REMAND (FIRST REQUEST FOR EXTENSION)

LARRY R. HICKS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

It is stipulated and agreed that Plaintiff Kristine Arcos shall have an extension up to and including December 7, 2022, within which to file her reply to Defendant Hudson Insurance Company's Opposition to the Motion to Remand (ECF No. 9).

This is Plaintiffs' first request for an extension in connection with her motion to remand or the opposition thereto.

Plaintiff requests this extension because Graham Galloway is currently out of the country on vacation and will not be returning to the office until December 5, 2022.

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.