From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Archibold-Murillo v. Medellin

United States District Court, N.D. Texas, Abilene Division
Apr 29, 2002
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:02-CV-023-C (N.D. Tex. Apr. 29, 2002)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:02-CV-023-C

April 29, 2002


ORDER


The Court has considered the Petitioner's petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241, together with Respondent's response and motion to dismiss.

Petitioner is currently incarcerated at the Big Spring Correctional Center and complains that officials at the prison have calculated his sentence incorrectly. Respondent advised that Petitioner has failed to exhaust his administrative remedies regarding the calculation of his sentence.

The exhaustion of administrative remedies is a prerequisite to the filing of a § 2241 petition. United States v. Gabor, 905 F.2d 76, 78 n. 2 (5th Cir. 1992); United States v. Dowling, 962 F.2d 390, 393 (5th Cir. 1992) (a prisoner seeking judicial review of credit for time served under 18 U.S.C. § 3585 (b) must demonstrate that he has exhausted his administrative remedies).

The Court finds that Respondent's motion to dismiss should be granted.

Petitioner's § 2241 petition for a writ of habeas corpus is dismissed for failure to exhaust administrative remedies.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Archibold-Murillo v. Medellin

United States District Court, N.D. Texas, Abilene Division
Apr 29, 2002
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:02-CV-023-C (N.D. Tex. Apr. 29, 2002)
Case details for

Archibold-Murillo v. Medellin

Case Details

Full title:ALBERTO ARCHIBOLD-MURILLO, Petitioner, v. TONY MEDELLIN, Warden, Big…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Texas, Abilene Division

Date published: Apr 29, 2002

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:02-CV-023-C (N.D. Tex. Apr. 29, 2002)