From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Archer v. Paramo

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - WESTERN DIVISION
Sep 5, 2016
NO. CV 16-00445-JLS (AS) (C.D. Cal. Sep. 5, 2016)

Opinion

NO. CV 16-00445-JLS (AS)

09-05-2016

VAUGHN S. ARCHER, Petitioner, v. DANIEL PARAMO, Warden, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. section 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, all of the records herein and the attached Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge. After having made a de novo determination of the portions of the initial Report and Recommendation to which objections were directed, the Court concurs with and accepts the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge in the Final Report and Recommendation.

IT IS ORDERED that Judgment be entered denying and dismissing the Petition with prejudice.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk serve copies of this Order, the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation and the Judgment herein on counsel for Petitioner and counsel for Respondent.

LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.

DATED: September 5, 2016.

/s/_________

JOSEPHINE L. STATON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Archer v. Paramo

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - WESTERN DIVISION
Sep 5, 2016
NO. CV 16-00445-JLS (AS) (C.D. Cal. Sep. 5, 2016)
Case details for

Archer v. Paramo

Case Details

Full title:VAUGHN S. ARCHER, Petitioner, v. DANIEL PARAMO, Warden, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - WESTERN DIVISION

Date published: Sep 5, 2016

Citations

NO. CV 16-00445-JLS (AS) (C.D. Cal. Sep. 5, 2016)