From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Archambault v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Jun 29, 2001
789 So. 2d 463 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

Opinion

Case No. 5D00-1852.

Opinion filed June 29, 2001.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Seminole County, Alan A. Dickey, Judge.

James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and Lyle Hitchens, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Rebecca Roark Wall, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.


We affirm Archambault's sentences which were imposed following revocation of his probation. The commission of new criminal offenses by Archambault while on probation is sufficient to revoke that probation. See Norton v. State, 691 So.2d 616 (Fla. 5th DCA), rev. denied, 698 So.2d 1225 (Fla. 1997); Singleton v. State, 633 So.2d 529 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994); Scherer v. State, 366 So.2d 840 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979). In addition, Archambault is not entitled to credit for time spent in jail on unrelated charges. See Sheehan v. State, 759 So.2d 747 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000); Hopping v. State, 350 So.2d 1087 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995).

AFFIRMED.

THOMPSON, CJ., and ORFINGER, R.B., J., concur.


Summaries of

Archambault v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Jun 29, 2001
789 So. 2d 463 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)
Case details for

Archambault v. State

Case Details

Full title:DONALD ARCHAMBAULT, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: Jun 29, 2001

Citations

789 So. 2d 463 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

Citing Cases

McMahill v. State

Although the judge made no oral findings during the hearing, McMahill specifically admitted to committing the…