From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Arch v. Parshall

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 25, 2013
CASE NO.: CV11-04454 DSF (PJWx) (C.D. Cal. Feb. 25, 2013)

Opinion

CASE NO.: CV11-04454 DSF (PJWx)

02-25-2013

EDWARD L. ARCH, Plaintiff, v. DET. GENE PARSHALL, DET. JOHN MACCHIARELLA, DET. EFRIN GUITERREZ, DET. TERENCE KEYZER, WILLIAM BRATTON, CHARLES BECK, JOHN DOE, LOS ANGELES POLICE DEPARTMENT, CITY OF LOS ANGELES, and TEN UNKNOWN NAMED DEFENDANTS ("DOES" 1-10), inclusive, Defendants


JUDGMENT ON SPECIAL VERDICT

The jury having returned a verdict on all claims in favor of defendants JOHN MACCHIARELLA, EFREN GUITERREZ, and TERENCE KEYZER, and against plaintiff EDWARD L. ARCH, and defendant GENE PARSHALL having been previously dismissed by plaintiff,

IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that:

1. Defendants shall have judgment against plaintiff on his claims;

2. Due to the jury's verdict, plaintiff's Monell claims against the City of Los Angeles and Charles Beck are dismissed with prejudice;

3. All remaining claims and defendants are dismissed with prejudice;

4. Plaintiff shall recover nothing from defendants; and,

5. Defendants shall recover from plaintiff their costs of suit pursuant to a bill of costs filed in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 1920.

____________________

HON. DALE S. FISCHER

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Arch v. Parshall

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 25, 2013
CASE NO.: CV11-04454 DSF (PJWx) (C.D. Cal. Feb. 25, 2013)
Case details for

Arch v. Parshall

Case Details

Full title:EDWARD L. ARCH, Plaintiff, v. DET. GENE PARSHALL, DET. JOHN MACCHIARELLA…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Feb 25, 2013

Citations

CASE NO.: CV11-04454 DSF (PJWx) (C.D. Cal. Feb. 25, 2013)