From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Arce v. Boone Cnty.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS WESTERN DIVISION
May 12, 2017
Case No: 3:16 CV 50193 (N.D. Ill. May. 12, 2017)

Opinion

Case No: 3:16 CV 50193

05-12-2017

Mario Arce, Plaintiff, v. Boone County, et al. Defendants.


ORDER , REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Settlement conference held on 5/12/2017. The case has settled with terms explained on the record. Plaintiff orally moves to dismiss individual defendants Ernest, Ewers, Hustead, and Erick under Civil Rule 41. Accordingly, it is this Court's Report and Recommendation to the District Court Judge that the plaintiff's oral motion be granted. Any objection must be filed by 5/26/2017. Failure to object may constitute a waiver of objections on appeal. See Provident Bank v. Manor Steel Corp., 882 F.2d 258, 260 (7th Cir. 1989). (2:07)
Date: May 12, 2017

/s/ Iain D. Johnston

U.S. Magistrate Judge


Summaries of

Arce v. Boone Cnty.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS WESTERN DIVISION
May 12, 2017
Case No: 3:16 CV 50193 (N.D. Ill. May. 12, 2017)
Case details for

Arce v. Boone Cnty.

Case Details

Full title:Mario Arce, Plaintiff, v. Boone County, et al. Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS WESTERN DIVISION

Date published: May 12, 2017

Citations

Case No: 3:16 CV 50193 (N.D. Ill. May. 12, 2017)