From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Arcamone-Makinano v. Haaland

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Aug 31, 2022
2:22-cv-00621-JAD-NJK (D. Nev. Aug. 31, 2022)

Opinion

2:22-cv-00621-JAD-NJK

08-31-2022

AMELIA ARCAMONE-MAKINANO, et al., Plaintiff(s), v. DEBRA HAALAND, et al., Defendant(s).


ORDER [DOCKET NOS. 20, 21]

NANCY J. KOPPE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pending before the Court is a Joint Proposed Discovery Plan. Docket No. 20. Also pending before the Court is Defendants' motion to stay the case, Docket No. 21, pending resolution of Defendant's motion to dismiss.

Based on the procedural posture of the case and the nature of Defendants' request, the Corn! construes the motion as a motion to stay discovery. To the extent Defendants seek a stay of discovery, however, a request must be filed identifying the governing standards and providing meaningful explanation as to how they are met. See, e.g., Kor Media Grp., LLC v. Green, 294 F.R.D. 579, 581 (D. Nev. 2013).

Accordingly, Defendants' Motion to Stay and the parties' Joint Proposed Discovery Plan, are DENIED without prejudice. Docket Nos. 20, 21. Any motion to stay discovery must be filed no later than September 6, 2022. If a motion to stay discovery is not filed by September 6, 2022, a renewed Joined Proposed Discovery Plan must be filed no later than September 7, 2022.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Arcamone-Makinano v. Haaland

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Aug 31, 2022
2:22-cv-00621-JAD-NJK (D. Nev. Aug. 31, 2022)
Case details for

Arcamone-Makinano v. Haaland

Case Details

Full title:AMELIA ARCAMONE-MAKINANO, et al., Plaintiff(s), v. DEBRA HAALAND, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Aug 31, 2022

Citations

2:22-cv-00621-JAD-NJK (D. Nev. Aug. 31, 2022)