From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Arbour Heights, Inc. v. Norman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
May 31, 1972
39 A.D.2d 836 (N.Y. App. Div. 1972)

Opinion

May 31, 1972

Appeal from the Onondaga Special Term.

Present — Goldman, P.J., Del Vecchio, Witmer, Gabrielli and Moule, JJ.


Order unanimously affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: Special Term properly dismissed defendant's complaint against Oliva who is plaintiff's agent. Plaintiff is chargeable with the knowledge and conduct of his agent through whom he acted ( Koslovki v. International Heater Co., 75 App. Div. 60, affd. 178 N.Y. 631). ¶ Proof of Oliva's knowledge and conduct might defeat plaintiff's claim against defendant but could not subject Oliva to third-party liability to defendant. Dole v. Dow Chem. Co. ( 30 N.Y.2d 143) is not applicable.


Summaries of

Arbour Heights, Inc. v. Norman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
May 31, 1972
39 A.D.2d 836 (N.Y. App. Div. 1972)
Case details for

Arbour Heights, Inc. v. Norman

Case Details

Full title:ARBOUR HEIGHTS, INC., Plaintiff, v. RUDOLPH NORMAN, Defendant and…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: May 31, 1972

Citations

39 A.D.2d 836 (N.Y. App. Div. 1972)

Citing Cases

Wings Wheels Express v. Sisak

It would, for example, be purposeless to allow impleader of the third-party defendant if the latter's…

Taft v. Shaffer Trucking

It is clear that New York law now permits an apportionment of damages among culpable parties "regardless of…