From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Metlife Ins. Co. v. Colosimo (In re Arbitration)

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Nov 14, 2014
122 A.D.3d 1321 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)

Opinion

2014-11-14

In the Matter of the Arbitration Between METLIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Petitioner–Appellant, and Christina Colosimo, Respondent–Respondent.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Donna M. Siwek, J.), entered December 18, 2013 in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 75. The order, among other things, granted respondent's cross motion to confirm an arbitration award. Gibson, McAskill & Crosby, LLP, Buffalo (Robert E. Scott of Counsel), for Petitioner–Appellant. William K. Mattar, P.C., Williamsville (Cheryl M. Reed of Counsel), for Respondent–Respondent.


Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Donna M. Siwek, J.), entered December 18, 2013 in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 75. The order, among other things, granted respondent's cross motion to confirm an arbitration award.
Gibson, McAskill & Crosby, LLP, Buffalo (Robert E. Scott of Counsel), for Petitioner–Appellant. William K. Mattar, P.C., Williamsville (Cheryl M. Reed of Counsel), for Respondent–Respondent.

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated in the decision at Supreme Court. CENTRA, J.P., FAHEY, SCONIERS, WHALEN, and DeJOSEPH, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Metlife Ins. Co. v. Colosimo (In re Arbitration)

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Nov 14, 2014
122 A.D.3d 1321 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)
Case details for

Metlife Ins. Co. v. Colosimo (In re Arbitration)

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Arbitration Between METLIFE INSURANCE COMPANY…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.

Date published: Nov 14, 2014

Citations

122 A.D.3d 1321 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)
2014 N.Y. Slip Op. 7857
994 N.Y.S.2d 885