From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Arbanil v. Flannery

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 18, 2006
31 A.D.3d 588 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)

Opinion

2005-00055.

July 18, 2006.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (McCarty III, J.), dated November 17, 2004, which granted the motion of the defendants Charles E. Flannery and Annmarie C. Flannery for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them.

Before: Miller, J.P., Goldstein, Spolzino and Dillon, JJ., concur.


Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is denied, and the complaint is reinstated insofar as asserted against the respondents.

The plaintiff allegedly sustained injuries when a dog owned by the defendants Charles E. Flannery and Annmarie Flannery (hereinafter the defendants) ran out into the street from their property, causing the plaintiff, who was riding a mountain bike, to make a sudden stop and fall to the ground. At the time of the accident, the local ordinance stated that it was unlawful for owners of dogs to allow their dogs to be "at large" or to "chase or otherwise harass any person in such a manner as to cause reasonable intimidation or to put such person in reasonable apprehension of bodily harm or injury" (Code of Town of East Hampton § 86-5 [B] [1], [4]). It was not uncommon for the defendants' dog to roam around within two blocks of their residence. The plaintiff alleged that the defendants were negligent in the manner in which they kept their dog in that they violated the local ordinance.

Where, as here, a plaintiff alleges a cause of action sounding in ordinary negligence, the salient issue is not whether the defendant had prior notice of the dog's vicious propensities. Rather, the issue is whether the defendant breached a duty of care owed to the plaintiff by negligently failing to prevent a foreseeable injury ( see Colarusso v Dunne, 286 AD2d 37; Silva v Micelli, 178 AD2d 521). Under the facts of this case, the defendants failed to establish their prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law ( see Faller v Schwartz, 303 AD2d 624).


Summaries of

Arbanil v. Flannery

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 18, 2006
31 A.D.3d 588 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
Case details for

Arbanil v. Flannery

Case Details

Full title:ERNESTO ARBANIL, Appellant, v. CHARLES E. FLANNERY et al., Respondents, et…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jul 18, 2006

Citations

31 A.D.3d 588 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
2006 N.Y. Slip Op. 5735
819 N.Y.S.2d 91

Citing Cases

Petrone v. Fernande

Some of the cases that had recognized common-law liability involved property owners who arguably breached…

McCarthy v. Sotomayor

Where a plaintiff alleges a cause of action sounding in ordinary negligence, the salient issue is not whether…