From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Arauz v. Holland

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 5, 2016
Case No. CV 14-06669 JFW (AFM) (C.D. Cal. Aug. 5, 2016)

Opinion

Case No. CV 14-06669 JFW (AFM)

08-05-2016

ROBERTO ARAUZ, Petitioner, v. KIM HOLLAND, Warden, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Second Amended Petition, records on file and the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge. Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report to which objections have been made. Petitioner's objections are overruled. The Court accepts the findings and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.

IT THEREFORE IS ORDERED that (1) the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is accepted and adopted; and (2) Judgment shall be entered denying the Second Amended Petition and dismissing the action with prejudice. DATED: August 5, 2016

/s/_________

JOHN F. WALTER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Arauz v. Holland

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 5, 2016
Case No. CV 14-06669 JFW (AFM) (C.D. Cal. Aug. 5, 2016)
Case details for

Arauz v. Holland

Case Details

Full title:ROBERTO ARAUZ, Petitioner, v. KIM HOLLAND, Warden, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Aug 5, 2016

Citations

Case No. CV 14-06669 JFW (AFM) (C.D. Cal. Aug. 5, 2016)