Summary
adopting report and recommendation holding that Riverbend employees are "employees of [TDOC]"
Summary of this case from Jones v. MaysOpinion
No. 3:06-0901.
August 24, 2007
ORDER
The Court has before it defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Docket Entry No. 32), a Report and Recommendation (Docket Entry No. 55) from the Magistrate Judge urging that the motion be granted, plaintiff's timely objections (Docket Entry No. 56) to the Report and Recommendation, and the defendants' response (Docket Entry No. 59) to the plaintiff's objections.
The Court has reviewed these pleadings de novo and, for the reasons stated in the Memorandum contemporaneously entered, finds that the plaintiff's objections lack merit. Therefore, the plaintiff's objections are OVERRULED. The Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED AND APPROVED in all respects. The Motion to Dismiss filed by defendants Bell, Colson, Castile and Love (Docket No. 32) is GRANTED.
It is so ORDERED.