We next consider Narita Export's priority of use of the TONOSAMA mark under § 1052(d). "The Board's determination of priority is a question of fact reviewed for substantial evidence," Araujo v. Framboise Holdings Inc., 99 F.4th 1377, 1380 (Fed. Cir. 2024), while the Board's evidentiary rulings are reviewed for abuse of discretion, Zheng Cai v. Diamond Hong, Inc., 901 F.3d 1367, 1370-71 (Fed. Cir. 2018). Under § 1052(d), a party may petition to cancel the registration of a mark that has been on the Principal Register for fewer than five years based on a likelihood of confusion with the petitioner's ownership of a mark used in the United States and not abandoned.