From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

A'Rasheed v. Virga

United States District Court, E.D. California
Dec 8, 2010
No. CIV S-10-1805 FCD GGH P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 8, 2010)

Opinion

No. CIV S-10-1805 FCD GGH P.

December 8, 2010


FINDINGS RECOMMENDATIONS


By order filed September 22, 2010, plaintiff (previously found ineligible to proceed in forma pauperis) was ordered, within twenty-eight days, to pay the $350.00 filing fee or submit documentation showing that he currently has $350.00 available in his prison trust account and to describe specifically his efforts to access these funds, and also describe specifically how defendants have prevented him from doing so. The twenty-eight day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not paid the fee or otherwise responded to the court's order.

IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Within fourteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court. The document should be captioned "Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations." Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: December 7, 2010


Summaries of

A'Rasheed v. Virga

United States District Court, E.D. California
Dec 8, 2010
No. CIV S-10-1805 FCD GGH P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 8, 2010)
Case details for

A'Rasheed v. Virga

Case Details

Full title:TAHEE A'RASHEED, Plaintiff, v. TIM VIRGA, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Dec 8, 2010

Citations

No. CIV S-10-1805 FCD GGH P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 8, 2010)