From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Araoye v. Vilsack

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Feb 5, 2024
Civil Action 23-1331 (E.D. Pa. Feb. 5, 2024)

Opinion

Civil Action 23-1331

02-05-2024

SAMUEL O. ARAOYE a/k/a ELLSWORTH D., Plaintiff, v. THOMAS J. VILSACK, JOSEPH HARRISON, STEPHANIE NIEMI, and DENNIS JEMMERSON, Defendants.


ORDER

WENDY BEETLESTONE, J

AND NOW, this 5th of February 2024, upon consideration of Defendants' Motion to Dismiss and Substitute Certain Defendants (ECF No. 53), Plaintiff's response thereto (ECF No. 54), and the parties' Cross-Motions for Summary Judgment (ECF Nos. 55-59), it is HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants Joseph Harrison, Stephanie Niemi, and Dennis Jemmerson are DISMISSED from this case and Plaintiff's claims for damages under Bivens v. Six Unknown Agents of the Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971), are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED, and Defendant Thomas J. Vilsack's Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED.

The Clerk of Court is directed to TERMINATE this matter and mark it CLOSED.


Summaries of

Araoye v. Vilsack

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Feb 5, 2024
Civil Action 23-1331 (E.D. Pa. Feb. 5, 2024)
Case details for

Araoye v. Vilsack

Case Details

Full title:SAMUEL O. ARAOYE a/k/a ELLSWORTH D., Plaintiff, v. THOMAS J. VILSACK…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Feb 5, 2024

Citations

Civil Action 23-1331 (E.D. Pa. Feb. 5, 2024)