From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Arango v. Bonilla

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 23, 2006
29 A.D.3d 834 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)

Opinion

2005-07414.

May 23, 2006.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Agate, J.), dated January 19, 2005, which, in effect, denied that branch of his motion which was to dismiss the complaint for lack of personal jurisdiction pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (8), and granted the plaintiff's oral application for leave to extend her time to serve the summons and complaint pursuant to CPLR 306-b.

Gordon Silber, P.C., New York, N.Y. (David Henry Sculnick of counsel), for appellant.

Taller Wizman, P.C., Rego Park, N.Y. (Y. David Taller of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Florio, J.P., Santucci, Mastro, Rivera and Covello, JJ., concur.


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Under the facts of this case, the Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in granting the plaintiff's application to extend the time within which to serve the summons and complaint pursuant to CPLR 306-b ( see Leader v. Maroney, Ponzini Spencer, 97 NY2d 95).


Summaries of

Arango v. Bonilla

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 23, 2006
29 A.D.3d 834 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
Case details for

Arango v. Bonilla

Case Details

Full title:SORAYA ARANGO, Respondent, v. JOSE A. BONILLA, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 23, 2006

Citations

29 A.D.3d 834 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
2006 N.Y. Slip Op. 4021
814 N.Y.S.2d 537

Citing Cases

Bertucci v. Mosey

We note that, although the court did not explicitly deny the cross motion, the failure to rule on the cross…