From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Aramini v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

United States Tax Court
Apr 5, 2022
No. 2191-22 (U.S.T.C. Apr. 5, 2022)

Opinion

2191-22

04-05-2022

ANGELICA ARAMINI, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent


ORDER

Maurice B. Foley, Chief Judge

On March 30, 2022, a Motion To Proceed Remotely was improperly filed by petitioner's CPA Albert Sidholm. That motion was not signed by petitioner or counsel for petitioner, as required by the Tax Court Rules. Mr. Sidholm is not admitted to practice before the Tax Court. The foregoing considered, it is

ORDERED that the above Motion To Proceed Remotely is hereby deemed stricken from the record in this case. 1


Summaries of

Aramini v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

United States Tax Court
Apr 5, 2022
No. 2191-22 (U.S.T.C. Apr. 5, 2022)
Case details for

Aramini v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

Case Details

Full title:ANGELICA ARAMINI, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE…

Court:United States Tax Court

Date published: Apr 5, 2022

Citations

No. 2191-22 (U.S.T.C. Apr. 5, 2022)