Araiza v. Curry

Full title: JESSE TRILLO ARAIZA, Petitioner, v. BEN CURRY, et al., Respondents

Court: United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Oct 7, 2008

No. CIV S-06-1419 MCE GGH P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 7, 2008)

Opinion

No. CIV S-06-1419 MCE GGH P.

October 7, 2008

ORDER

MORRISON ENGLAND JR., District Judge

Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On July 29, 2008, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Neither party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed July 29, 2008, are adopted in full; and

2. This action is dismissed without prejudice.