From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Aragona V v. Shaibani

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Apr 6, 2016
138 A.D.3d 649 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)

Opinion

2015-04273, Index Nos. 7258/13, 602440/13.

04-06-2016

Joseph A. ARAGONA V, etc., plaintiff, v. Alireza SHAIBANI, also known as Reza Shaibani, also known as Ray Shaibani, et al., defendants; Levitt LLP, nonparty-appellant. (Action No. 1) Land Site Development, LLC, et al., plaintiffs, v. A & R Capital Associates, et al., defendants; Levitt LLP, nonparty-appellant. (Action No. 2) (and another action).

  Levitt LLP, Mineola, N.Y. (Jennifer Ann Wynne of counsel), nonparty-appellant pro se.


Levitt LLP, Mineola, N.Y. (Jennifer Ann Wynne of counsel), nonparty-appellant pro se.

REINALDO E. RIVERA, J.P., MARK C. DILLON, CHERYL E. CHAMBERS, and THOMAS A. DICKERSON, JJ.

In related actions, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of fiduciary duty and to foreclose a mechanic's lien, which were joined for trial, nonparty Levitt LLP appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Bucaria, J.), entered May 18, 2015, which denied its unopposed renewed motion for leave to withdraw as counsel of record for Joseph A. Aragona V, the plaintiff in Action No. 1, and Land Site Development, LLC, a plaintiff in Action No. 2.

ORDERED that the order is reversed, on the facts and in the exercise of discretion, without costs or disbursements, and the renewed motion of Levitt LLP for leave to withdraw as counsel of record for Joseph A. Aragona V, the plaintiff in Action No. 1, and Land Site Development, LLC, a plaintiff in Action No. 2, is granted; and it is further,

ORDERED that within 30 days of the date of this decision and order, the appellant shall (1) serve the plaintiffs Joseph A. Aragona V and Land Site Development, LLC, with a copy of this decision and order by certified mail, return receipt requested, and by ordinary mail with proof of mailing, which shall constitute notice to appoint another attorney pursuant to CPLR 321(c), and (2) serve a copy of this decision and order by ordinary mail, with proof of mailing, upon the attorneys for the defendants in these actions; and it is further,

ORDERED that upon filing of proof of such service with the Clerk of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, the appellant shall be relieved as counsel for the plaintiffs Joseph A. Aragona V and Land Site Development, LLC; and it is further,

ORDERED that all proceedings in these actions are stayed until 30 days after service upon the plaintiffs Joseph A. Aragona V and Land Site Development, LLC, is complete. The Supreme Court improvidently exercised its discretion in denying the appellant's unopposed renewed motion for leave to withdraw as counsel for Joseph A. Aragona V, the plaintiff in Action No. 1, and Land Site Development, LLC (hereinafter Land Site), a plaintiff in Action No. 2. An attorney may be permitted to withdraw from employment where a client refuses to pay reasonable legal fees (see Rules of Professional Conduct [22 NYCRR 1200.0 ] rule 1.16 [c] [5]; Weiss v. Spitzer, 46 A.D.3d 675, 848 N.Y.S.2d 237 ; Winters v. Winters, 25 A.D.3d 601, 602, 807 N.Y.S.2d 302 ; Matter of Lenk, 218 A.D.2d 802, 631 N.Y.S.2d 67 ). Additionally, an attorney may withdraw from representing a client if the client “fails to cooperate in the representation or otherwise renders the representation unreasonably difficult for the lawyer to carry out employment effectively” (Rules of Professional Conduct [22 NYCRR 1200.0 ] rule 1.16[c][7]; see Green v. Gasparini, 24 A.D.3d 505, 506, 808 N.Y.S.2d 292 ; McCormack v. Kamalian, 10 A.D.3d 679, 781 N.Y.S.2d 743 ).

Here, the appellant established that Aragona and Land Site were in substantial arrears in the payment of legal fees and failed to cooperate in their representation. Further, these plaintiffs did not oppose the appellant's renewed motion for leave to withdraw as their counsel. Accordingly, the renewed motion for leave to withdraw as counsel for Aragona and Land Site should have been granted (see Alvardo–Vargas v. 6422 Holding Corp., 85 A.D.3d 829, 830, 925 N.Y.S.2d 176 ; Musachio v. Musachio, 80 A.D.3d 738, 915 N.Y.S.2d 497 ; Winters v. Winters, 25 A.D.3d at 602, 807 N.Y.S.2d 302 ).


Summaries of

Aragona V v. Shaibani

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Apr 6, 2016
138 A.D.3d 649 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
Case details for

Aragona V v. Shaibani

Case Details

Full title:Joseph A. ARAGONA V, etc., plaintiff, v. Alireza SHAIBANI, also known as…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Apr 6, 2016

Citations

138 A.D.3d 649 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
29 N.Y.S.3d 68
2016 N.Y. Slip Op. 2598

Citing Cases

Villata v. Kokkinos

The law firm appeals. The Supreme Court improvidently exercised its discretion in denying the law firm's…

Applebaum v. Einstein

The appellant appeals from the orders entered November 7, 2016, and May 12, 2017." ‘The decision to grant or…