From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Arafat v. U-Haul

Supreme Court of Florida.
Jan 23, 2014
134 So. 3d 445 (Fla. 2014)

Opinion

No. SC12–2562.

2014-01-23

Nasra M. ARAFAT, Petitioner(s) v. U–HAUL, National Fire Insurance, etc., et al., Respondent(s).


Petitioner has submitted a “Petition for Writ of Mandamus From Appellate Court Fourth District.” Because petitioner has failed to show a clear legal right to the relief requested, she is not entitled to mandamus relief. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is hereby denied. See Huffman v. State, 813 So.2d 10, 11 (Fla.2000).

PARIENTE, LEWIS, CANADY, LABARGA, and PERRY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Arafat v. U-Haul

Supreme Court of Florida.
Jan 23, 2014
134 So. 3d 445 (Fla. 2014)
Case details for

Arafat v. U-Haul

Case Details

Full title:Nasra M. ARAFAT, Petitioner(s) v. U–HAUL, National Fire Insurance, etc.…

Court:Supreme Court of Florida.

Date published: Jan 23, 2014

Citations

134 So. 3d 445 (Fla. 2014)