From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Arafat v. Jhalil

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Feb 19, 2013
105 So. 3d 601 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

Opinion

No. 4D11–4722.

2013-02-19

Nasra M. ARAFAT, Appellant, v. Mohamed JHALIL, Appellee.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Michael G. Kaplan, Judge; L.T. Case No. 11–6269 DCVE. Nasra M. Arafat, Coral Springs, pro se. Mohamed Jhalil, Sunrise, pro se.


Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Michael G. Kaplan, Judge; L.T. Case No. 11–6269 DCVE.
Nasra M. Arafat, Coral Springs, pro se. Mohamed Jhalil, Sunrise, pro se.
PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So.2d 1150, 1152 (Fla.1979) (“Without a record of the trial proceedings, the appellate court can not properly resolve the underlying factual issues so as to conclude that the trial court's judgment is not supported by the evidence or by an alternative theory.”).

MAY, C.J., GROSS and GERBER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Arafat v. Jhalil

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Feb 19, 2013
105 So. 3d 601 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)
Case details for

Arafat v. Jhalil

Case Details

Full title:Nasra M. ARAFAT, Appellant, v. Mohamed JHALIL, Appellee.

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Date published: Feb 19, 2013

Citations

105 So. 3d 601 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)