From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Arafa v. Holder

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California
Dec 1, 2014
CV 14-595 PSG RNBx (C.D. Cal. Dec. 1, 2014)

Opinion


Samer Arafa v. Eric Holder, et al. No. CV 14-595 PSG RNBx United States District Court, Central District of California December 1, 2014

          PROCEEDINGS (IN CHAMBERS): ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE LACK OF PROSECUTION

          Philip S. Gutierrez, United States District Judge

         IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff show cause in writing on or before December 8, 2014 why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution.

         The Court will consider the filing of the following as an appropriate response to this Order to Show Cause.

         Pursuant to Rule 78 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 7.15, oral argument will not be heard in this matter unless so ordered by the Court.

         ___ Proof of Service of Summons and Complaint by Plaintiff.

         _X_ Response to Complaint by Defendant(s) OR Request for Entry of Default by Plaintiff.

         ___ Motion for Entry of Default Judgment by Plaintiff OR Request to Clerk for Entry of Default Judgment by Plaintiff.

         Failure to respond in writing, may result in the dismissal of the entire action.

         Pursuant to Local Rule 5-4.5, one mandatory chambers copy of every electronically filed document must be delivered to Courtroom 880, no later than 12:00 noon on the following business day. Further, the mandatory chambers copy shall comply with Local Rule 11-3.


Summaries of

Arafa v. Holder

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California
Dec 1, 2014
CV 14-595 PSG RNBx (C.D. Cal. Dec. 1, 2014)
Case details for

Arafa v. Holder

Case Details

Full title:Samer Arafa v. Eric Holder, et al.

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California

Date published: Dec 1, 2014

Citations

CV 14-595 PSG RNBx (C.D. Cal. Dec. 1, 2014)