From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Arabia v. Zisman

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division
Mar 9, 1978
157 N.J. Super. 335 (App. Div. 1978)

Opinion

Argued February 22, 1978 —

Decided March 9, 1978.

Before Judges LORA, SEIDMAN and MILMED.

Mr. Morgan E. Thomas argued the cause for appellant-plaintiff class.

Mr. Willis F. Flower argued the cause for defendants-respondents Boardwalk National Corporation, Atlantic City Realty Company, James Candy Company, Holiday Inn, Isador and Eva Dion, First National Bank of South Jersey as Trustee under Indenture of Trust for Gettleman Trust, Williamson's Joint Venture, Etc. ( Messrs. Kirkman, Mulligan, Bell Armstrong, attorneys; Mr. Flower on the brief).

Mr. John Lloyd, Jr. argued the cause for defendant-respondent Leeds and Lippincott Company ( Messrs. Lloyd, Megargee, Steedle Connor, attorneys; Mr. Lloyd on the brief).

No brief was filed on behalf of plaintiff-respondent City of Atlantic City.

Mr. Louis Niedelman filed a statement in lieu of brief on behalf of defendants-respondents M. Neustadter, Steel Pier and Albert Toll ( Messrs. Cooper, Perskie, Katzman, April, Niedelman Wagenheim, attorneys).

Mr. Joseph E. Robertson filed a statement in lieu of brief on behalf of defendant-respondent Grace George.

Mr. Matthew H. Powals filed a statement in lieu of brief on behalf of defendant-respondent Walter Thomas Smith ( Mr. Frank J. Ferry, attorney).

Mr. Lawrence Milton Freed submitted a statement in lieu of brief on behalf of defendants-respondents Estate of Emerson Richards, deceased, M.L.R. Co. and Seaside Realty Improvement Co.

Mr. Stuart B. Finifter submitted a statement, in lieu of brief on behalf of defendant-respondent Albert Cohen ( Messrs. Land Finifter, attorneys).

No brief was filed on behalf of any of the remaining defendants-respondents.


The portions of the judgment under review are affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed by Judge Gruccio in his opinion reported at 143 N.J. Super. 168 (Ch.Div. 1976).

Appellants' request for an allowance of counsel fees on the appeal is denied. They may, of course, apply for a counsel fee in the trial court when there is "a fund in court" out of which the same may be allowed. See R. 4:42-9(a)(2). No costs to any party on the appeal.


Summaries of

Arabia v. Zisman

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division
Mar 9, 1978
157 N.J. Super. 335 (App. Div. 1978)
Case details for

Arabia v. Zisman

Case Details

Full title:AMELIA ARABIA, ON BEHALF OF HERSELF AND ALL OTHER MEMBERS OF THE CLASS…

Court:Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division

Date published: Mar 9, 1978

Citations

157 N.J. Super. 335 (App. Div. 1978)
384 A.2d 1110

Citing Cases

Union Cnty. Util. v. Bergen Cnty. Util.

We note that the state courts may find that the complex and unique equities at issue in any matter involving…

Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company v. Lacroix

See Mitchell v. Oksienik, 380 N.J.Super. 119, 130-31, 880 A.2d 1194 (App.Div. 2005) ("`In doing equity, [a]…