From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

ARA v. KHAN

United States District Court, E.D. New York
Mar 5, 2008
CV 07-1251 (ARR) (JO) (E.D.N.Y. Mar. 5, 2008)

Opinion

CV 07-1251 (ARR) (JO).

March 5, 2008


ORDER


Attorney Christian A. Cavallo ("Cavallo"), a member of the bar of the State of New Jersey who is not admitted to practice before this court, has moved to be admitted pro hac vice to appear for the plaintiff in the instant case pursuant to Local Civil Rule 1.3(c). A motion to admit an attorney pro hac vice, like any other application for relief in this court, may only be made by an attorney who is himself already admitted, either as a member of the bar of this court or on a pro hac vice basis. See Loc. Civ. R. 1.5(b)(6); Erbacci, Cerone, and Moriarty, Ltd. v. United States, 923 F. Supp. 482, 486 (S.D.N.Y. 1996). As a result, an attorney who needs to gain admission pro hac vice must necessarily seek the assistance of a current member of the bar to make the required motion. For that reason, I deny the instant application without prejudice to renewal by a properly admitted attorney.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

ARA v. KHAN

United States District Court, E.D. New York
Mar 5, 2008
CV 07-1251 (ARR) (JO) (E.D.N.Y. Mar. 5, 2008)
Case details for

ARA v. KHAN

Case Details

Full title:HASMAT ARA, Plaintiff, v. SAKINA KHAN, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. New York

Date published: Mar 5, 2008

Citations

CV 07-1251 (ARR) (JO) (E.D.N.Y. Mar. 5, 2008)