From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

A.R. Fuels, Inc. v. City of New York

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Feb 7, 1980
402 N.E.2d 1166 (N.Y. 1980)

Opinion

Argued January 9, 1980

Decided February 7, 1980

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department, ISRAEL RUBIN, J.

Allen G. Schwartz, Corporation Counsel (Craig A. Landy and Leonard Koerner of counsel), for appellant.

George Sassower for respondent.


MEMORANDUM.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.

Nothing in the wording of section 105 of the General Municipal Law proscribes the city's acceptance of a condition permitting withdrawal of a bid after less than 45 days, nor has the city pointed to any legislative history so suggesting. Having so provided in its standard form of contract for some 30 years, the city can, as to future contracts, obviate any problem by amending its contract form. It cannot, however, impose such a change retroactively on plaintiff by contorting the words of the statute.

Chief Judge COOKE and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER, FUCHSBERG and MEYER concur in memorandum.

Order affirmed.


Summaries of

A.R. Fuels, Inc. v. City of New York

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Feb 7, 1980
402 N.E.2d 1166 (N.Y. 1980)
Case details for

A.R. Fuels, Inc. v. City of New York

Case Details

Full title:A.R. FUELS, INC., Respondent, v. CITY OF NEW YORK, Appellant

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Feb 7, 1980

Citations

402 N.E.2d 1166 (N.Y. 1980)
402 N.E.2d 1166
426 N.Y.S.2d 265

Citing Cases

A.R. Fuels, Inc. v. City of New York

The balance, also billed at market price, was paid at contract price. Ultimately plaintiff was vindicated in…

A.R. Fuels, Inc. v. City of New York

The judgment of the Supreme Court, New York County, appealed from, and the orders of the Appellate Division…