From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

April v. Brooks

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
May 30, 2008
Civil Action No. 06-68 Erie (W.D. Pa. May. 30, 2008)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 06-68 Erie.

May 30, 2008


MEMORANDUM ORDER


Plaintiff's civil rights complaint was received by the Clerk of Court on March 20, 2006 and was referred to Chief United States Magistrate Judge Susan Paradise Baxter for report and recommendation in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and Rules 72.1.3 and 72.1.4 of the Local Rules for Magistrates.

The Chief Magistrate Judge's report and recommendation [47], filed on April 16, 2008, recommends that Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Second Amended Complaint [42] be granted. The parties were allowed ten (10) days from the date of service to file objections. Plaintiff filed his objections to the report and recommendation [48] on May 6, 2008.

After de novo review of the Amended Complaint and the documents in the case, together with the Report and Recommendation and Plaintiff's objections thereto, the following order is entered:

AND NOW, this 30th Day of May, 2008, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Second Amended Complaint [42] be, and hereby is, GRANTED.

The Report and Recommendation of Chief Magistrate Judge Susan Paradise Baxter [47] filed on April 16, 2008, is adopted as the opinion of this Court.


Summaries of

April v. Brooks

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
May 30, 2008
Civil Action No. 06-68 Erie (W.D. Pa. May. 30, 2008)
Case details for

April v. Brooks

Case Details

Full title:NICHOLAS APRIL, Plaintiff, v. SUPERINTENDENT MARILYN BROOKS, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: May 30, 2008

Citations

Civil Action No. 06-68 Erie (W.D. Pa. May. 30, 2008)