Opinion
3:13-CV-00628-RCJ-CLB
10-11-2022
Applications in Internet Time, LLC, Plaintiff, v. Salesforce, Inc. Defendant.
Michael A. Burke ROBISON, SHARP, SULLIVAN & BRUST Andrea Pacelli Mark S. Raskin Michael DeVincenzo Charles Wizenfeld Daniel Miller KING & WOOD MALLESONS LLP John Frankovich, Leigh Goddard, Philip Manelly, McDonald Carano LLP Kevin Johnson Ray Zado Sam Stake James Judah Attorneys for Defendant Salesforce, Inc.
Michael A. Burke ROBISON, SHARP, SULLIVAN & BRUST Andrea Pacelli Mark S. Raskin Michael DeVincenzo Charles Wizenfeld Daniel Miller KING & WOOD MALLESONS LLP
John Frankovich, Leigh Goddard, Philip Manelly, McDonald Carano LLP Kevin Johnson Ray Zado Sam Stake James Judah Attorneys for Defendant Salesforce, Inc.
ORDER TO EXTEND RESPONSIVE DEADLINES TO SALESFORCE'S MOTION TO DISMISS DKT. 281
(FIRST REQUEST)
Pursuant to Local Rule IA 6-1, the parties, by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate and request that this Court extend the deadlines for Plaintiff Applications in Internet Time, LLC (“AIT”) and Defendant Salesforce, Inc. (“Salesforce”) to file their Response and Reply Briefs to Salesforce's Motion to Dismiss Dkt. 281, respectively, as follows:
Event
Current Deadline
New Deadline
Plaintiff to submit responsive brief to Salesforce's Motion to Dismiss Dkt. 281
October 14, 2022
October 28, 2021
Salesforce to submit reply brief in support of its Motion to Dismiss Dkt. 281
October 21, 2022
November 18, 2022
This is the first stipulation for extension of time.
Reasons for Request for Extension: The parties will be concurrently briefing summary judgment motions and Daubert motions. The parties agree that additional time is warranted to ensure that the issues addressed are adequately presented to the Court.
IT IS SO ORDERED.