From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Application of Metro. Transp. v. Ausnit

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 24, 2003
306 A.D.2d 190 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

Opinion

1505N

June 24, 2003.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Stanley Parness, J.), entered February 13, 2002, granting claimant condemnee's motion for an additional allowance pursuant to EDPL § 701, including an award of $307,560.37 for attorneys' fees, an award of $29,250 for appraisal fees and an award of $3318.72 for miscellaneous expenses, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Anthony P. Semancik, for petitioner-appellant.

M. Robert Goldstein, for claimants-respondents.

Before: Nardelli, J.P., Andrias, Saxe, Williams, Friedman, JJ.


In this eminent domain proceeding, while petitioner condemnor's offer for the condemned property was $3.6 million, respondent claimant, after trial, was awarded $4,871,157, a sum substantially, indeed 35.3%, in excess of the offer. Accordingly, Supreme Court properly exercised its discretion in granting claimant-respondent, pursuant to EDPL § 701, a total additional allowance of $340,129.09, which was reasonable under the circumstances (see Hakes v. State of New York, 81 N.Y.2d 392, 397-398).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.


Summaries of

Application of Metro. Transp. v. Ausnit

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 24, 2003
306 A.D.2d 190 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
Case details for

Application of Metro. Transp. v. Ausnit

Case Details

Full title:IN RE APPLICATION OF METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY, ETC.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jun 24, 2003

Citations

306 A.D.2d 190 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
763 N.Y.S.2d 549