From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Appleby v. Farhat

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 2, 2022
2:20-CV-2113-WBS-DMC-P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 2, 2022)

Opinion

2:20-CV-2113-WBS-DMC-P

06-02-2022

TONY APPLEBY, Plaintiff, v. ALEX FARHAT, Defendant.


ORDER

DENNIS M. COTA, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the Court is Plaintiff's motion, ECF No. 33, for an extension of time. Plaintiff's motion is denied because he does not state what deadline he wants extended. This Order is without prejudice to Plaintiff's renewed request with an appropriate clarification of what deadline is sought to be extended.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Appleby v. Farhat

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 2, 2022
2:20-CV-2113-WBS-DMC-P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 2, 2022)
Case details for

Appleby v. Farhat

Case Details

Full title:TONY APPLEBY, Plaintiff, v. ALEX FARHAT, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Jun 2, 2022

Citations

2:20-CV-2113-WBS-DMC-P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 2, 2022)