From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Apple v. Samsung Elec

United States District Court, N.D. California
Nov 28, 2011
CASE NO. 11-cv-01846-LHK-PSG (N.D. Cal. Nov. 28, 2011)

Opinion

CASE NO. 11-cv-01846-LHK-PSG.

November 28, 2011.


[PROPOSED ] ORDER GRANTING SAMSUNG'S STIPULATED ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL


Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc., and Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC (collectively, "Samsung") have filed Samsung' Stipulated Administrative Motion to File Under Seal Its Reply in Support of its Motion to Exclude Ordinary Observer Opinions of Apple Expert Cooper Woodring (the "Motion to Seal").

Samsung has filed the declaration required under Civil L.R. 79-5 and General Order No. 62 to provide evidence of good cause for this Court to permit filing under seal. The declaration establishes that information contained in the below documents has been designated as HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEY'S EYES ONLY by Apple. Apple does not oppose this administrative motion.

Accordingly, for good cause shown, the Court ORDERS that the following documents shall be filed under seal:

1. The confidential, unredacted version of Samsung' Reply in Support of its Motion to Exclude Ordinary Observer Opinions of Apple Expert Cooper Woodring (the "Reply"); and
2. Exhibit 3 to the Supplemental Declaration of Michael Zeller in Support of the Reply.

The Court further ORDERS that a redacted version of Samsung' Reply shall be filed on ECF.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Apple v. Samsung Elec

United States District Court, N.D. California
Nov 28, 2011
CASE NO. 11-cv-01846-LHK-PSG (N.D. Cal. Nov. 28, 2011)
Case details for

Apple v. Samsung Elec

Case Details

Full title:APPLE v. SAMSUNG ELEC

Court:United States District Court, N.D. California

Date published: Nov 28, 2011

Citations

CASE NO. 11-cv-01846-LHK-PSG (N.D. Cal. Nov. 28, 2011)