Apple, Inc. v. Int'l Trade Comm'n

Full title: APPLE INC., Appellant, v. INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION, Appellee, and…

Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: Jul 23, 2012

471 F. App'x 906 (Fed. Cir. 2012)

Opinion

2011-1592

07-23-2012

APPLE INC., Appellant, v. INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION, Appellee, and EASTMAN KODAK COMPANY, Intervener.

BRIAN FERGUSON, Weil, Gotshal & Manges, LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for appellant. PANYIN A. HUGHES, Attorney, Office of the General Counsel, United States International Trade Commission, of Washington, DC, argued for appellee. With him on the brief were JAMES M. LYONS, General Counsel, and MICHELLE W. KLANCNIK, Acting Assistant General Counsel. ALAN L. BARRY, K&L Gates LLP, of Chicago, Illinois, argued for intervenor. With him on the brief were MICHAEL J. ABERNATHY, JASON A. ENGEL and BENJAMIN E. WEED; and MICHAEL J. BETTINGER, of San Francisco, California; and ERIC C. RUSNAK, of Washington, DC.

PER CURIAM

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

Appeal from the United States International Trade

Commission in Investigation No. 337-TA-717

JUDGMENT

BRIAN FERGUSON, Weil, Gotshal & Manges, LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for appellant.

PANYIN A. HUGHES, Attorney, Office of the General Counsel, United States International Trade Commission, of Washington, DC, argued for appellee. With him on the brief were JAMES M. LYONS, General Counsel, and

MICHELLE W. KLANCNIK, Acting Assistant General Counsel.

ALAN L. BARRY, K&L Gates LLP, of Chicago, Illinois, argued for intervenor. With him on the brief were MICHAEL J. ABERNATHY, JASON A. ENGEL and BENJAMIN E. WEED; and MICHAEL J. BETTINGER, of San Francisco, California; and ERIC C. RUSNAK, of Washington, DC.

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (NEWMAN, O'MALLEY AND WALLACH, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

________

Jan Horbaly

Clerk