From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Apple Bank for Sav. v. Pricewaterhousecoopers, LLP

Supreme Court of the State of New York. New York County
Apr 14, 2009
23 Misc. 3d 1126 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 2009)

Summary

In Apple Bank, the Appellate Division, First Department, reversed the Supreme Court, which had found a question of fact about whether certain claims based on tax advice and the resulting tax returns are timely under the continuous representation doctrine.

Summary of this case from Reville v. Melvin Ginsberg & Assocs.

Opinion

April 14, 2009.


Accounts and Accounting — Action against Accountants — Malpractice. Limitation of Actions — Accountant Malpractice — Continuous Representation. Civil Practice Law and Rules — § 214 (6) (Three-year statute of limitations; for malpractice other than medical, dental or podiatric malpractice).


Summaries of

Apple Bank for Sav. v. Pricewaterhousecoopers, LLP

Supreme Court of the State of New York. New York County
Apr 14, 2009
23 Misc. 3d 1126 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 2009)

In Apple Bank, the Appellate Division, First Department, reversed the Supreme Court, which had found a question of fact about whether certain claims based on tax advice and the resulting tax returns are timely under the continuous representation doctrine.

Summary of this case from Reville v. Melvin Ginsberg & Assocs.
Case details for

Apple Bank for Sav. v. Pricewaterhousecoopers, LLP

Case Details

Full title:Apple Bank for Sav. v. PricewaterhouseCoopers, LLP

Court:Supreme Court of the State of New York. New York County

Date published: Apr 14, 2009

Citations

23 Misc. 3d 1126 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 2009)
2009 N.Y. Slip Op. 50948

Citing Cases

Reville v. Melvin Ginsberg & Assocs.

No corrective or remedial services were offered. As a result, there was no mutual understanding between the…

Dempsey v. Chaves & Perlowitz LLP

As noted above, in holding that New York does not permit the recovery of taxes paid, Chen relies upon Menard…