Summary
In Apple Bank, the Appellate Division, First Department, reversed the Supreme Court, which had found a question of fact about whether certain claims based on tax advice and the resulting tax returns are timely under the continuous representation doctrine.
Summary of this case from Reville v. Melvin Ginsberg & Assocs.Opinion
April 14, 2009.
Accounts and Accounting — Action against Accountants — Malpractice. Limitation of Actions — Accountant Malpractice — Continuous Representation. Civil Practice Law and Rules — § 214 (6) (Three-year statute of limitations; for malpractice other than medical, dental or podiatric malpractice).