From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Appistry, LLC v. Amazon.com, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Feb 10, 2017
2016-2417 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 10, 2017)

Opinion

2016-2417

02-10-2017

APPISTRY, LLC, Plaintiff-Appellant v. AMAZON.COM, INC., AMAZON WEB SERVICES, INC., Defendants-Appellees

ANTHONY G. SIMON, The Simon Law Firm, P.C., St. Louis, MO, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Also represented by TIMOTHY DAVID KRIEGER, BENJAMIN R. ASKEW, MICHAEL P. KELLA. ALAN M. FISCH, Fisch Sigler, LLP, Washington, DC, argued for defendants-appellees. Also represented by ROY WILLIAM SIGLER, JENNIFER ROBINSON, JEFFREY MATTHEW SALTMAN; DAVID M. SAUNDERS, San Jose, CA.


NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington in No. 2:15-cv-01416-RAJ, Judge Richard A. Jones.

JUDGMENT

ANTHONY G. SIMON, The Simon Law Firm, P.C., St. Louis, MO, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Also represented by TIMOTHY DAVID KRIEGER, BENJAMIN R. ASKEW, MICHAEL P. KELLA. ALAN M. FISCH, Fisch Sigler, LLP, Washington, DC, argued for defendants-appellees. Also represented by ROY WILLIAM SIGLER, JENNIFER ROBINSON, JEFFREY MATTHEW SALTMAN; DAVID M. SAUNDERS, San Jose, CA. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (LOURIE, HUGHES, and STOLL, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT February 10, 2017

Date

/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court


Summaries of

Appistry, LLC v. Amazon.com, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Feb 10, 2017
2016-2417 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 10, 2017)
Case details for

Appistry, LLC v. Amazon.com, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:APPISTRY, LLC, Plaintiff-Appellant v. AMAZON.COM, INC., AMAZON WEB…

Court:United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: Feb 10, 2017

Citations

2016-2417 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 10, 2017)

Citing Cases

Valjakka v. Netflix, Inc.

to supply an inventive concept where a limitation, for example, “merely described generic optical character…