From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Appiah v. Espinal

United States District Court, S.D. New York
May 4, 2022
20-CV-4575 (JLC) (S.D.N.Y. May. 4, 2022)

Opinion

20-CV-4575 (JLC)

05-04-2022

SOLOMON APPIAH, Plaintiff, v. OMAR ESPINAL, et al., Defendants.


ORDER OF DISMISSAL

JAMES L. COTT, United States Magistrate Judge.

The Court having been advised by counsel's letter dated May 4, 2022 (Dkt. No. 55) that all claims asserted herein have been settled, it is hereby ORDERED that the above-entitled action be and is hereby dismissed and discontinued without costs, but without prejudice to the right to reopen the action within 30 days of the date of this Order if the settlement is not consummated.

To be clear, any application to reopen must be filed within 30 days of the date of this Order; any application to reopen filed thereafter may be denied solely on that basis. Further, if the parties wish for the Court to retain jurisdiction for the purposes of enforcing any settlement agreement, they must submit the settlement agreement to the Court within the same 30-day period to be “so ordered” by the Court.

Any pending motions are moot. The Clerk is directed to close this case.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Appiah v. Espinal

United States District Court, S.D. New York
May 4, 2022
20-CV-4575 (JLC) (S.D.N.Y. May. 4, 2022)
Case details for

Appiah v. Espinal

Case Details

Full title:SOLOMON APPIAH, Plaintiff, v. OMAR ESPINAL, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: May 4, 2022

Citations

20-CV-4575 (JLC) (S.D.N.Y. May. 4, 2022)